Comments on: Why You’re a Global Warming Denier

By: Marie'

Marie' — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:36:47 +0000

Look could you please stop your blasphemy and keep Jesus Christ out of this! I am a christian and I beleive in global warming, but being a christian is not about believeing or not believing in global warming!!!! If you would read the Bible you will clearly see that being a christian means that you have accepted Christ as your God and Saviour! Why does the whole world have a problem with christianity, but not with other religions! Makes you think hey!

By: WakeupWorld

WakeupWorld — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:04:09 +0000

ahh yea. not sure if anyone noticed but the temperature on all of the planets in the galaxy is increasing – so what we need to do is raise awareness about the galactic problem and maybe we can pay a tax to try to reduce the carbon production on Saturn and all of the other planets. or we can just look at the source for all the heat in the galaxy and figure out that the sun creates the heat – and increased solar activity is a direct result of increased temperatures throughout the galaxy. but hey the government knows how to spend my money better than i do – so i will be happy to give them my money anyway. Taxation is Slavery.

By: Global Warming? Huh? What? | Twilight Earth

Global Warming? Huh? What? | Twilight Earth — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:02:59 +0000

[...] article was Written by Stephanie Rogers with Earthfirst.com. I ran across it last week, and have been wondering weather or not to post it. EarthFirst has [...]

By: Pointy-Hatted Geek

Pointy-Hatted Geek — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:24:15 +0000

Here’s a radical idea:

We all stop sniping at each other and clean up our planet anyway. (That is, stop spewing excessive amounts of gunk into the atmosphere.) That way, those of us who believe in global warming can be happy that we’re doing something and those of us who don’t can continue to deny everything. Because while this is an impressive debate, it’s a complete waste of time and doesn’t get anything done, as the believers aren’t likely to stop believing and the nonbelievers aren’t likely to start.

Is it so bad for us to do something just for the heck of it?

By: Mooja

Mooja — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:04:32 +0000

Nice work Edward and nice article. I especially like the part when the snide one dares you to write an article and you reply that you already had one. I didn’t see any responses other than the lazy dismissal. I find the deception the AGW proponent will sink to fascinating.

By: Jeremiah

Jeremiah — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:10:20 +0000

I ask for peer-reviewed journal papers or basic datasets and you throw your hands up & call me media-blinded. Brilliant!

Thank you for showing your political ideology based denial like a spotlight.

Your belief & whining does not refute the accumulated scientific knowledge.

By: DavidONE

DavidONE — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:59:31 +0000

At an Austrian economics conference.

Ooh. Impressive. That can be used in place of a coherent argument backed up with evidence.*

I enjoy debating this subject…

Oh, is that what you’ve been doing? It looks more like intellectual dodge ball to me.

* sarcasm

By: Edward

Edward — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:41:33 +0000

Ok, I get the picture.

Good luck discovering the truth about this, I rather think that for you lot that won’t happen until the media reports it :p Great thing about science is that in the end truth does win, so my hopes are high and I believe the time is approaching quite fast actually.

Anyway, I hope you feel suitably silly and shamed when you do figure it out, seeing as you are pretty unpleasant to people who disagree with you. Good bye.

By: Jeremiah

Jeremiah — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:38:00 +0000

Global warming skeptics aren’t uneducated and uninformed. Global warming deniers are.

Skeptics pose unanswered questions and present research to support their point. Deniers ask the same trite questions endlessly, despite receiving full explanatory answer each time, and present politicized bluster, partial truths, outright myths & juvenile ad hominems.

Present research that supports your point or unanswered questions, and I will call you a skeptic.

Stephanie didn’t post an ad hominem swipe, she posted a bit of derisive sarcasm. If you’re going to point out logical fallacies, learn the difference.

By: Shea Gunther

Shea Gunther — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:28:44 +0000

Edward, don’t you get it? We’re having fun knocking you around. We don’t really need to prove you are wrong, that’s a given. You amuse us, with your 148 IQ and ‘A’ grade skepticbabble papers. You are our toy, the foil which we turn to in order to work off frustration over the dumbassery of the rightwing denial squad.

Keep telling us how smart and important you are and we’ll keep making fun of you for it.

Have fun at the conference!