Quantcast

UK Court Decides Threat of Global Warming Justifies Breaking the Law

September 17, 2008 · Print This Article

Talk about a precedent: a UK court ruled last week that the threat of global warming is such a pressing issue, that Greenpeace activists were right to cause more than $62,000 dollars in damage to a coal-fired power station.  Last October, the six protesters had scaled the chimney at the Kingsnorth power plant in Kent and painted Prime Minster Gordon Brown’s name on it.  The activists were upset about a plan to build another coal-fired power plant, which they said would be ‘a disastrous setback in the battle against global warming’.

From The Independent:

Jurors accepted defence arguments that the six had a “lawful excuse” to damage property at Kingsnorth power station in Kent to prevent even greater damage caused by climate change. The defence of “lawful excuse” under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 allows damage to be caused to property to prevent even greater damage – such as breaking down the door of a burning house to tackle a fire.

During the eight-day trial, the world’s leading climate scientist, Professor James Hansen of Nasa, who had flown from American to give evidence, appealed to the Prime Minister personally to “take a leadership role” in cancelling the plan and scrapping the idea of a coal-fired future for Britain. Last December he wrote to Mr Brown with a similar appeal. At the trial, he called for an moratorium on all coal-fired power stations, and his hour-long testimony about the gravity of the climate danger, which painted a bleak picture, was listened to intently by the jury of nine women and three men.

The activists said they acted lawfully, believing that their attempt to stop emissions from Kingsnorth would prevent further damage to properties worldwide caused by global warming.  They said that their actions were designed to cause only the amount of damage necessary to close the plant down.

It’s pretty amazing that Johnny Law came down on the side of the earth – especially given the fact that the jury was made up of ordinary people, not necessarily environmentalists.  It’s a good sign that people are starting to take the threat of global warming seriously, and yet another wake-up call to turn away from coal and start using cleaner technology.

Link [The Independent]
Photo credit: Greenpeace

Related Posts:

Civil Disobedience is Necessary to Kill Coal
Global Warming Activists Super Glue Themselves Around Statue
Greenpeace Takes Over Four Italian Coal-Fired Power Stations
Congress Struggles to Clean Up Power Plant in its Own Backyard
Al Gore Urges Civil Disobedience to Fight Coal Plants

Comments

2 Responses to “UK Court Decides Threat of Global Warming Justifies Breaking the Law”

  1. Roy on September 17th, 2008 10:47 am

    That’s impressive for any country’s legal system. I can’t even stretch my mind to see the US legal system coming to the same conclusion… I wonder how the break-a-door-down-to-fight-a-fire type situation is handled here? If similarly, could there be a chance of a trial here going the same way?

    My environmentalist side hopes so.
    That is until more extreme groups gain shelter… a bunch of paint is one thing, bombs would be another!

    But finally… neat. Good job, British greenies!

  2. Einstien on September 17th, 2008 8:31 pm

    This is a creepy decision. The end does not justify the means.

    Condoning terrorism is evil. The judges should be put on trial.

    The tables will be turned around some day, and this disgusting decision will come back to haunt.

Got something to say?