<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Wants 45 New Nuclear Reactors by 2030</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthfirst.com/mccain-wants-45-new-nuclear-reactors-by-2030/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthfirst.com/mccain-wants-45-new-nuclear-reactors-by-2030/</link>
	<description>A Sharp Eye -- With a Green Edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:39:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Buhbaloo</title>
		<link>http://earthfirst.com/mccain-wants-45-new-nuclear-reactors-by-2030/comment-page-1/#comment-3406</link>
		<dc:creator>Buhbaloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthfirst.com/?p=1356#comment-3406</guid>
		<description>I work in the industrie

We already have 48 nuclear plant requests in progress in the US, McCain just said that to get the logical thinkers.

Nuclear is cleaner than Solar, Wind, and Hydro when you work on the CO2 per KWH of electricity level (I have the documentation if youd like it)

the &quot;Smoke&quot; you see coming out of those smoke stacks on nuclear, isnt nuclear radiated smoke.  Its the equivelant of boiling waters steam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in the industrie</p>
<p>We already have 48 nuclear plant requests in progress in the US, McCain just said that to get the logical thinkers.</p>
<p>Nuclear is cleaner than Solar, Wind, and Hydro when you work on the CO2 per KWH of electricity level (I have the documentation if youd like it)</p>
<p>the &#8220;Smoke&#8221; you see coming out of those smoke stacks on nuclear, isnt nuclear radiated smoke.  Its the equivelant of boiling waters steam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solex</title>
		<link>http://earthfirst.com/mccain-wants-45-new-nuclear-reactors-by-2030/comment-page-1/#comment-3265</link>
		<dc:creator>Solex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthfirst.com/?p=1356#comment-3265</guid>
		<description>Great Idea...
They couldn&#039;t protect the TWIN TOWERS or the PENTAGON, let&#039;s give&#039;em 45 new &#039;targets&#039; to wipe us out.

Don&#039;t consider those primative other ideas, like:
[] SOLAR
[] WIND
[] HYDRO ELECTRIC

Good thinking John... no wonder you got caught and were a P.O.W..   Smarten up pal... this is the only planet with Live People on it for a reason, let&#039;s keep it that way?  duh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Idea&#8230;<br />
They couldn&#8217;t protect the TWIN TOWERS or the PENTAGON, let&#8217;s give&#8217;em 45 new &#8216;targets&#8217; to wipe us out.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t consider those primative other ideas, like:<br />
[] SOLAR<br />
[] WIND<br />
[] HYDRO ELECTRIC</p>
<p>Good thinking John&#8230; no wonder you got caught and were a P.O.W..   Smarten up pal&#8230; this is the only planet with Live People on it for a reason, let&#8217;s keep it that way?  duh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://earthfirst.com/mccain-wants-45-new-nuclear-reactors-by-2030/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthfirst.com/?p=1356#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s a sharp fellow, but doesn&#039;t score points with me till he comes up with his own plan.  &quot;We have to think carefully&quot; only gets you a &quot;neutral&quot; rating.

At least neither of them has said &quot;HEY how about more cheap, clean COAL plants?&quot;  

Coal.  
Cheap.  Abundant.  Cheap.  ( I loved that video )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s a sharp fellow, but doesn&#8217;t score points with me till he comes up with his own plan.  &#8220;We have to think carefully&#8221; only gets you a &#8220;neutral&#8221; rating.</p>
<p>At least neither of them has said &#8220;HEY how about more cheap, clean COAL plants?&#8221;  </p>
<p>Coal.<br />
Cheap.  Abundant.  Cheap.  ( I loved that video )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://earthfirst.com/mccain-wants-45-new-nuclear-reactors-by-2030/comment-page-1/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthfirst.com/?p=1356#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>they stopped making those for a reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they stopped making those for a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
