Quantcast

7 Places Global Warming is Smacking the Crap Out of the Earth Right Now

by Stephanie Rogers · View Comments

Droughts. Hurricanes. Floods. Monsoons. Disappearing coastlines. These are just a few of the weather effects we’re currently experiencing and will see more of in the future, courtesy of global warming. And they aren’t pretty – they lead to destruction, injury and the death of millions of people, not to mention the effects on the earth’s ecosystems.  Scientists are noting more weather disturbances than ever, and it’s only going to get worse. Right now, in seven places across the globe, people are already dealing with the frightening effects of global warming, from India to Alaska.  It’s a foreboding sign of what may be to come for the entire world as we battle global warming and experience its full effects.

1. Bihar, India


Image via The Bihar Times

Floods are certainly nothing new – but lately they’ve been increasing in intensity and frequency. Bihar, India was swamped by the Kosi river two weeks ago, and nearly half a million people in this eastern state remain stranded, perched on rooftops, surviving off plants and dirty water.  The river was swollen by monsoon rains attributed to global warming, and burst an upstream dam in Nepal. Millions are now homeless, scores have died and the death toll is expected to rise due to waterborne illnesses and food riots.

Bihar is one of India’s poorest states, typical of the areas that are expected to be affected the most by global warming-related weather patterns. The crops that residents of the area depend upon have been destroyed by the deluge, and lingering caste discrimination has exacerbated problems with the relief efforts.

2. The North Pole


Image via Mail Online

For the first time in history, the North Pole has become an island.  Melting ice has opened up the North-West and North-East passages, to the delight of shipping companies eager to cut thousands of miles off their routes and the chagrin of experts who understand the gravity of the situation. Pictures produced by NASA confirm that Arctic ice is melting at an unprecedented pace.

The Natural Resources Defense Council says, ‘The Arctic is global warming’s canary in the coal mine’.  Such rapid melting of ice is already dramatically affecting the ecosystem of the Arctic, and those changes will affect surrounding ecosystems as well in a sort of trickle-down effect.  The melting ice is accelerating global warming, causing the earth to absorb more sunlight and get hotter.  Land-based ice sheets and melting glaciers contribute to rising sea levels, which are currently threatening coastlines around the world, as you’ll see on the rest of this list.

3. South Australia


Image via BBC News

Australia is currently experiencing its worst drought in 100 years, and the lack of rain has caused once-lush lands to turn into deserts.  Farmers are watching their crops dry up in a wide-scale agricultural disaster, and don’t have enough water to sustain their livestock.  Lake Albert, in South Australia, has receded so much that vast areas of land once covered by water now resemble a moonscape.  The region seems to be on the brink of environmental collapse, with large populations of animals dying or migrating elsewhere.

Worse yet, the drought is taking place in Australia’s main food-growing region, the Murray-Darling basin. Irrigated crops like rice and grapes have been hit the hardest, as well as horticulture: 80% of eucalyptus trees in an area the size of Germany and France combined are brown and dead.  Slowly warming temperatures combined with the lack of rainfall are to blame. Climate scientists warn that every rise of 1 degree Celsius reduces river inflows by 15%.

4. The Maldives


Image via Wikimedia Commons

This tiny chain of islands in the Indian Ocean has watched sea levels rise dramatically for years, with the islands growing smaller and smaller. President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom has been entreating other nations for help since 1992, telling the UN, “I stand before you as a representative of an endangered people. We are told that as a result of global warming and sea-level rise, my country, the Maldives, may sometime during the next century, disappear from the face of the Earth.”

Many efforts have been put forth in attempts to save The Republic of Maldives from rising sea levels, including a sea wall on one island, and a new man-made island built to relocate communities to a safer area.  But over half of the islands are still eroding at an alarming rate, and Maldivians may see their ocean paradise disappear sooner than anyone thought.

5. The West African Coastline


Image via Yahoo News

A 2,500-mile stretch of the West African coast will be ‘brutally redrawn’ over the next century by rising sea levels caused by global warming, and citizens living in the area are already experiencing negative effects.  The countries most threatened by the effects are Gambia, Nigeria, Burkina Faso and Ghana.  The coastline of Guinea is expected to disappear altogether, salty sea water threatens intrusion into agricultural land and the region’s income-generating oil fields are extremely vulnerable to flooding.

Increasingly violent tropical storms are contributing to the rising sea levels, as well as the melting of the Greenland ice cap, which covers an area three times the size of Nigeria. Floods will likely occur again and again over the coming decades, displacing millions.  Africa is expected to be hardest hit by global warming.

6. Coastal Alaska


Image via USA Today

Escalating erosion, storms and flooding have threatened some Eskimo communities in Alaska so much that villagers are being relocated.  Alaska experiences the effects of global warming much more than the rest of the U.S., because it’s in a polar region. Temperatures have been steadily rising since the 1950’s, and as a result permafrost melting has caused the erosion and flooding.

Six remote villages, including the Yupik Eskimo community of 400, have been named as the most vulnerable and are getting millions of dollars of aid from the government in an attempt to protect them in the coming year. Earlier this year, a tiny Inuit village sued some of the world’s largest oil, coal and power producers, saying global warming was threatening the villagers’ existence.

7. Western North America


Image via Wikimedia Commons

Though the effects of global warming may be more dramatic in Alaska than other areas of North America, that doesn’t mean we’ve escaped unharmed thus far. In Canada, high-elevation white bark pine trees that usually have life spans longer than 1,000 years are being killed at a frightening pace by a little beetle that has proliferated due to warmer winters.   The pine bark beetle has killed lodgepole pine forests from the British Columbia Coast Range to the Continental Divide, and it’s expected to sweep through the Washington and Oregon Cascades, the Sierras of California and the Rockies.

The white pine is a vital part of the ecosystem in these areas, where ‘tree islands’ slow the melting of snow and hold the soil together on high, windy ridges.  Pine seeds are an important food for grizzly bears, and many other species depend upon the trees for survival.  The western forests of America could see dramatic, life-altering changes as warming trends continue.

  • Noah

    jump alaskin dude

  • Gunsoma

    true tht

  • Jane

    RE: Blah Blah Blah, they used to believe the world was flat! Wake up!

  • anon

    This world will burn. An upon the flame of the pyre mankind with rise to godhood.
    This planet shall be utterly consumed until only we and our sacred machines remain.

  • Greg King

    Blah blah. I do believe that man is in a large part responsible, but for whatever reason, we cannot deny that there are catastrophic events taking place around the world, and that this is the time for Homo Erectus to stand together and help each other, but I suppose that is just a dream. Peace to all mankind....

  • baah

    Not only do politicians have a hold on the media, but apparently the scientific data as well...just take a look at the descrepanies..and lack of unbiased information in any major news source.

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/ip...

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/sc...

    http://www.jonesreport.com/art...

  • anonymous complainer

    yes, lets continue to breathe and pollute, because they are going to tax us for it if we continue to let them push this global warming SCAM and make it expensive to breathe. the equation used to "prove" global warming is inacurate because you could literally put any data in it and it would spit out he same results. But if a politician says its true, then the american people forget everything else because they think the govt is out for everyones best interest. Its more about money than about the peoples interests. Oh and obama is a great speaker, but all that means is he is more convincing and it's easier to lie to you. Hitler was a great speaker and where did that get Germany? GLOBAL WARMING IS A SCAM. If you don't see that, then send your pay checks directly to the white house and move to the ghetto now.

  • chris colbert

    I hate cold. Nobody likes cold weather. That's why there are no good songs about having a great time while freezing your ass off. All the good songs are about summer time.
    If you tools actually do manage to cool down the entire planet!???, I will hate you with all my heart and soul.
    I doubt you can pull it off though. Your best plan seems to involve carbon credits or some crap. And your leader is Al Gore! HA HA HA!

    Good luck tools,
    The heat miser

  • Bill Jenkins

    The problem is "Pollutants" to the greenies is CO2. Which, of course, means that the mere fact that you are breathing makes you a polluter.

    I'd love to cease "polluting" of individuals who perpetuate this garbage that the earth is going to be destroyed because we drive cars and have coal-fired power plants.

    "Solar power! Solar power!" First of all, you need the sun to be out. Not very efficient in places like Seattle, eh? Next, that power costs several times more than coal power. You don't like your $100 electric bill for running the AC to your home in the summer? How about $500-$1000/mo? Oh yeah, then the government will subsidize your bill and stick the money makers with your bill.

    I'm all about smart environmental laws, not lunacy like most greenies advocate.

  • So are you saying, then, that it's all good and we should continue to unnaturally pour tons and tons of pollutants into our atmosphere?

  • chris

    global warming, durp!

    We've had record lows this winter, but isn't the earth supposed to be getting warmer? but durp, people say its true so it must be... DURP!

  • crandles

    Is it just me that reacts to point out

    smacking-the-doodoo-out-of-the-earth-right-now

    and

    A 2,500-mile stretch of the West African coast will be ‘brutally redrawn’ over the next century

    my country, the Maldives, may sometime during the next century

    The western forests of America could see dramatic, life-altering changes as warming trends continue.

    ?

    Should this be seen as the article admitting it is failing to point out 7 places and can only manage 4?

    Probably not - but is it really appropriate to hype up the language with phrases like 'smacking the c**p' ? That is surely just asking for lots of drivel in responses.

  • Matt

    I just want to say to all the scientific people out there; can you prove creationism wrong? Did you know that the evolution timeline corresponds with the biblical accounts of the creation. I have studied both sides and found merit in both. Some of you liberal persons will not examine the other sides arguments. I know that some conservative persons do the same thing. I dont think that intelligent people base their opinions on someone elses "findings". We need to research for ourselves and find out what you believe in. I for one choose to believe that there is a GOD and all of this perfect universe was created by HIM. I have a M.S in Biology( for validity sake). If you choose not to believe in GOD that is your choice and I will pray that you will someday see the light. I know this is off point but several people brought this up and it struck me odd. Back on point---You know that all the published global warming research is done by government backed scientists, and I cant think of one thing the government has done good. If the scientists fail to produce "results", the government pulls their funding. Hmmm I wonder what they are going to do..... Something for you to think about......and research yourself.

  • Hey guys. I don't like to look up information about anything really. I'm personally more comfortable with dismissing mentally disturbing theories and hypotheses. I find that life is much easier to live when you don't think there's any consequences to anything.

    It's astounding to me that people in here will ridicule creationists for not looking up facts about anything, but will then go ahead and make retarded statements about climate change/global warming. I don't swing either way, but that's because I haven't given either side enough research. As I suspect of most people on here.

  • Chad

    Okay, even if global warming is real and we work on fixing it, we are going to destroy ourselves anyways in the long run. We are advancing technology for all of the wrong reasons. Yes, a lot of it makes life more convenient, but at the same time we are developing weapons along the way that will eventually destroy us all. We continue to develop bigger and stronger weapons, for what? World domination? I'm telling you, no matter what if we dont change the way things are run, we are going to destroy ourselves in this race for control. So okay, lets make the earth cleaner and slow down "global warming", but wipe off the face of the earth with our chemical weapons or whatever weapons our wonderful greedy, control hungry goverments (not just the US, all goverments) want to produce. the world leaders have it all wrong and this advancement is going to lead to things unimaginable. Call me crazy, and I hope that i am just being crazy, but either way I believe we are doomed.

  • Hi Chad.

    Sure, scientists aren't always right. Certainly, there have been things that scientists have said over the past thousand years that turned out to be very wrong. But, the threat of global warming is a matter of life or death - not just for a handful of people, but the entire human race, along with millions of other species. The way modern civilization is progressing isn't sustainable. We're greatly damaging the planet in so many ways, and we have got to make a lot of changes regardless of whether global warming is man-made or not (which I strongly, strongly believe that it is). Isn't our place on the planet worth fighting for? Shouldn't we start behaving in responsible ways that ensure that we aren't the downfall of so many innocent creatures? As others have said, yes, the earth will survive. But what about us? It's incredibly short-sighted to assume we can go on living the way we are living right now and that everything will be fine.

  • Chad

    Maybe i dont know what im talking about, but my point is all of you people will listen to what you are told, and not think about the subject. Believing that scientists have all of the answers to what is going on can be considered just as stupid as believing in creationism. Scientists prove themselves wrong all of the time, and people just change their beliefs along with these scientists. Technology 1000 years from now may prove how unintelligent our scientists are today, but we take it all as fact and are spoon fed ideas and take it as truth.

    Scientists have tested anthrax on a secluded island thinknig it was safe and believed that it would dissipate within a short period of time, but the spores ended up being transferred to the shore miles away by the wind and killed a bunch of horses, and they returned to the ilsand years later and the anthrax is still there... So my point is, scientists are only human, they aren't super beings with all of the answers and they really don't know what they are doing completely. Global Warming is just a theory, the earth goes through changes and I don't know how scientists can say they know that this is "our fault" for the clilmate change... I'm not saying we arent contributing to it, but I dont think we are as responsible as they say... We can't even predict the weather, yet we can say exactly what the earth is doing is solely our fault? come on people.... seriously...

  • Mark

    So I guess Dr. Noah Robinson of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine and the almost 32,000 scientists (over 9,000 with PhD's) that signed his GW skeptic petition are all full of shit?

    Publisher's Note: Yup. Exactly. Totally full of shit. Like you.

  • Mark

    Over 31,000 scientists say it's crap...this is just one...

    http://www.discovery.org/v/30

    Publisher's Note: The Discovery Institute is a bullshit rightwing thinktank that believes in Creationism. They have about as much credibility on scientific issues as Focus on the Family. Check it out at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...

    The fact that the Discovery Institute thinks Global Warming is crap is good evidence that it's spot on.

  • Mooja

    Shea, are you saying you believe water should be classified as a pollutant? Maybe that's the next target since water vapor is by far the most abundant greenhouse gas. If water and C02 can be classified as a pollutant then there is nothing on Earth that is not a pollutant.

    When nurseries, arborists, etc want to increase production in their greenhouses they increase CO2 levels. Plants love the stuff. Here we are saying it's a pollutant. I believe the plants would disagree. For a

  • Dmpetti

    With all this, you still have 40,000 people at the RNC chanting "Drill Baby Drill." Something is fundamentally wrong.

  • Tom

    Wow, it's so cute that people still pretend that climate change is a matter of opinion!
    It's like 'Hmmm, I don't think the sun exists today because I don't believe in it anymore and scientists that tell me otherwise are just trying to con me.' Awesome! Some people on here are actually denying the whole concept of climate change over and above the specifically man-made... staggering.
    For a few minutes this made me giggle, but then I realised these are probably the same people who proudly vote Bush (while even he's cottoned on to the futility of denying the facts).
    I would *love* to see a Venn Diagram of climate change deniers, creationists, holocaust deniers, and republicans!

  • jim

    Correction-

    They don't call it global warming any more since the earth is actually cooling. Now they call it climate change. Antarticas ice cap has expanded 1 mil k.
    Don't buy into all this bad science. Florida is not going to be underwater. If all the ice melted the oceans would still rise only inches not feet

  • blah

    Blaming liberals or conservatives for false ideas like man made global warming is as ignorant as global warming itself. This is just stuff made up by people who can't get enough money or power.

  • Just think of the future of arctic tourism! Nome Tropicana, drinks are free!

    (oh ghod, we’re all fried)

  • Traci

    Why all the harsh words, either you believe it or you don't ...I don't think its worth getting that upset about it? The truth is even if man has no impact on global warming, does it even matter? Shouldn't we still be working towards alternative and sustainable energy and fuels? Shouldn't we be stewards of the planet and try to keep it as pristine as it once was? conserve, recycle , consume less, help more....aren't those ideals that can be used whether the planet is warming or cooling....make some sense people

  • partypooper

    Eskimo is a racial epithet. Inuit is preferred.

  • Charles

    Oh noes. You put the smack down on me fer sure.

    I bet you Digg your own articles too. What a dumb fuck. And then you complain when people visit your piece of shit site and prove you wrong.

    Keep changing my posts all you want, but you can't change science, idiot.

  • @Charles You're new to the internet, right? Most bloggers, the good ones at least, comment on their own blogs. What a rube. :D

    I hope you stick around, I can see you being fun to smack down on a regular basis.

  • Charles

    Oh I get it now. Shea Gunther IS the kickass moderator:

    From SheaGunther.Org
    I’m currently the Publisher and VP of Content at Chicago based startup EarthFirst and am a prolific Stumbler. You can email me at sheagunther@gmail.com if you feel the need.

    So you post comments to your own rag? Get a life.

  • Rohan

    I have always been thinking why the world is facing more and more of these weird problems?
    What will happen if everything gets destroyed?
    Who is responsible for this?
    Is there any way to revert the changes back?
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Intellectually I know that each and every one of us are responsible to some extent but I have never been able to receive a satifactory answer which would give a holistic picture until I came across this site.
    http://www.spiritualresearchfo...
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
    I always knew that there is some other dimension to the cause of these problems. What modern sciences can do is just to predict the changes but it actually cannot overcome them

  • Tiny

    How could you deny global warming. It's happening!

  • Not to contest the noble ideas of conservation and moderation espoused by this article and many of the commenters, but just to toss out a few rambling comments on a just couple more of the details...

    "Pictures produced by NASA confirm that Arctic ice is melting at an unprecedented pace..."

    OTOH, interestingly, the Antarctic ice sheet has been *growing* for at least a decade or two:
    http://www.space.com/scienceas...
    http://www.globalwarming.org/n...
    http://www.commondreams.org/he...
    While the details over this are somewhat open for interpretation, and one might validly wonder why one pole seems to be gaining ice while the other loses ice, it does seem to *suggest* a bit of global-scale balancing of what's happening locally in the Arctic.

    "Floods are certainly nothing new – but lately they’ve been increasing in intensity and frequency. Bihar, India was swamped by the Kosi river two weeks ago..."

    Bihar has suffered floods from the Kosi River for decades, largely due to the perpetually shifting nature of the river itself. Interestingly, the largest such flood occurred 54 years ago (in August of 1954). Greater damage could be suffered from such events today, even when the floods are significantly smaller than the historical worth, simply due to the increased population density (i.e., candidate victims) in the affected areas.

    See also http://www.time.com/time/natio... for a similar discussion concerning reasons behind the increases in hurricane disaster damage in recent years.

    The discussion at http://www.heartland.org/Artic..., relating to Michael Crichton's "State of Fear", is also an interesting read. There's plenty of contraversy over the science and data claimed in this novel, but plenty of supporting scientific (and other) literature, as well, making it worth a bit more attention/response than a dismissive wave.

    IAC, I hear about the purported consensus of the scientific community in favor of global warming all the time, but the *actual* scientific community literature on the subject is far less clear, and actual historical global weather trends (based on, you know, actual historical data) seem to contradict such a consensus.

    At the same time... Which story -- global warming gloom-and-doom, or data-supported emperor-has-no-clothes -- would be easier to sell to and by the mass media (regardless of which one might be true)? From scientists who want to earn and hold onto research grant moneys, to media who want to attract entranced eyeballs, it's clearly more profitable to promote the global warming gloom-and-doom scenario. This doesn't discount the possibility that such is the case, but it *should* add a little demanding show-me-the-data scepticism to anyone listening.

    Like I said, just a few more rambling comments... :-)

  • Charles

    Hey moderator, can you fix that typo for me?

  • Charles

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!WARNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    The moderators of this site WILL change your posts to fit their veiws.
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!WARNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Charles

    I got an idea admin, how about you actually back up your article and prove me wrong? Alas, I guess it's easier to abuse your power and change my post to fit what you want, huh? Kinda like how you treat science.

  • Charles

    @The DumbAss Admin

    You think it's funny to change my posts? I avoided calling you a fucking idiot for your dumb ass article, but that's a low trick for even an idiot like you.

  • Al Hunter

    Wow. This discussion is self-destructing.
    Much like human technological civilization.
    Doesn't matter much whether the cause is 'natural' or 'man-made' (is there really a difference?). It is happening to us, now, and to our children.
    I'd like our human cultural and scientific knowledge to survive, but I'm not confident it will.
    Try to make simple, positive choices for your own and your family's lives, and hope to survive.

  • How did you know!?! I fscking hate babies. Smug little bastards, sitting there pooping and crying and doing nothing good for society.

    Kind of like you Charles.

    :D

  • Charles

    I'm just a sterotypical idiot who doesn't share his booze.

  • Baby hating?! lol - wow, that's a new one - at least for EarthFirst.

  • Charles

    @Shea
    You ignorant baby hating liberal piece of shit. Do you think insulting people makes a stronger argument?

    I got an idea. How about you form a f*cking opinion of your own rather than waiting for King Gore to give you one?

    Fscking lemming.

  • danny

    Globle warming is a hoax! Do some research! This is Jr high school science.
    For the last 50 years, the linear warming trend has been 0.13 °C [0.10 to 0.16 °C] per decade according to AR4. ....... "Dont you find this unusually stable?"

  • And I love when people like @Chad say "think for yourself".

    "Think for yourself" doesn't mean you can ignore Science.

    Creationism isn't "thinking for yourself".

    Thinking the moon landing was faked isn't "thinking for yourself".

    And discounting the very real and quantifiable effects of man made global warming isn't "thinking for yourself".

    You're just thinking like an idiot. You're a rightwing GOP Big Oil tool, just like Fox News. They just get paid a lot more.

  • Charles

    QUOTE:France gets the exact same amount of energy, 76%, from nuclear power. Why can’t we?

    ANSWER: Because of the exact same idiots that are crying that we're ruining the Earth. Apparently nuclear isn't green enough for them.

    QUOTE:What we do know is that rapid changes are happening.

    ANSWER: We do? Are we supposed to ignore the FACT that temperatures have actually decreased since 1998? A couple more years of that and you guys are gonna have to change the name to "Global Cooling". Kinda like you did in the 70's.

    How about the FACT that actual scientists say that CO2 increases/decreases occur AFTER temperature changes, not before. That's like saying that getting fat will make you pregnant. Learn the difference between causation and effect.

    I'm not condoning waste. I do think it's important to conserve our finite resources. I would like to see our government put more money into developing cheaper sources of renewable energy, but I'm not a follower and I do my own research. Man-made global warming is a farce.

  • @Chad Sorry, but you're a dumbass. The ancient Greeks knew the world was round thousands of years before Jeebus was born. You're showing your complete lack of education in trying to tie together the goat herders who thought the world was flat back then with todays scientists. Man made Global Warming is a fact and you (and all the other ignorant trolls commenting here) are right wing sound bite loving dittomonkeys. We love you, you entertain us.

  • @tntpop nice! Another rightwing dittohead. :D

    In the 70's I was just screaming. I wasn't quite 2 years old when the 80's rolled in.

  • Chad

    Global warming is a fact? It was also once a fact that the world was flat, based on the scientists "advanced" knowledge.... Come on people, there was an Ice Age, the earth goes through dramatic changes and now we are blaming everything on ourselves... Yeah, im sure our wastefulness isnt good for the environment, but I think people are way too caught up in "global warming". A thousand years from now (if we make it that long) scientists may look back at our current scientists and say how foolish they were. But we take everything that scientists say as fact, because we dont know any better... Think for yourselves please.

  • tntpop

    The earth is in a natural cycle that humans cannot seem to grasp or control.... sorry nothing else to see here.

    Shea...where you screaming about "Global Cooling" in the 70's?

  • Andre

    Quick question, of all the posters from both sides of the issues:

    How many of you have taken the time to understand the science?
    How many are scientific professionals or technical enough to understand the science?

    To me it seems like there is too much belief. Both sides of the arguments have believers.

    Science is not belief. Science is based on analysis and factual results. Scientific results can change.

    What we do know is that rapid changes are happening. This is cause for concern. We should not bury our heads in the sand and make audacious claims such as global warming is a rumour.

    Doing so is ignorance, but then again ignorance is bliss.... until the freight train runs you over!

  • The Seer

    You got that right! This is a wake up call for all mankind, the signs are everywhere, they come in the forms of monsoons, sea levels raising, erosion, earthquakes, storms and floading, so prepare yourselves for a major shake-up, be ready and don't let the next wave take you off gaurd. The earth is a living being and it is reacting to our abuse and over consumptation. One of these days some cities will become ghost town and not even leaving the trace of human civilization.

  • Tony

    The Maldives are sinking - the seas are not rising. It sits bang on top of an area of volcanic activity and seismic movements. Do some research and your'll find that the rest of the examples you choose to prove your case are fatally flawed.

  • Yo Momma

    for you haters-

    what's so wrong with lessening pollutants or advocating renewable energy sources? why are you so goddamn sure that we are NOT hurting the environment? why the fsck are you so steadfast in your ways? where is this confidence coming from? and why do you try to use arguments rooting from natural history? principle of uniformity doesnt really exist. you know that right? you fscking morons.

  • Dolphinus

    The periodic massive extinction of nearly everything on earth is also a totally natural process. Since Mooja can spell "cyanobacteria" I assume you also know that the rise of said bacteria 2.3 billion years ago caused the utter destruction of the existing environment with a horrible atmospheric pollutant that utterly transformed the atmosphere and all life from that point forward -- it's called oxygen. So I'm sure the future species of the planet will thank your helping plan and execute the extinction of humans on earth. So long and thanks for all the fish!

  • In response to Mooja and what Shea said afterward - the key to all of it is balance. We have totally thrown the earth out of balance. Sure, the earth will survive. It will adapt and continue. But will we?

    For anyone who really feels that man is so insignificant that we can't possibly be the cause of global warming - look at how much of an effect we've had on the earth. Sure, we are insignificant in the scheme of nature. But, we've outgrown our pants here. We are rapidly destroying our surroundings with the idea that everything will somehow work out on its own. It will. But it might kill us in the process.

  • Walter

    You know to me the saddest part of the entire issue is that we will spend millions of dollars to have wars over religion and oil but when it comes down to using green energy for our planet and our own sake all we can do is argue about it for years. We have all known from the beginning that there was not an unlimited amount of oil available. That one day those great wells gushing black gold would dry up.

    Has it occurred to anyone that we not only depend on oil for transportation and energy but for some of the most basic pieces of our lives. Namely Plastic. Yeah there are some bioplastic options out there but the abundance of wonderful molecules we get from petroleum cannot be replaced easily synthetically. We really need to be very conservative with the oil we have and use it sparingly. In time we can develop the technologies to move away from petrol all together but until then we should be very conservative. Who cares if we are only twenty percent of the cause of global warming today?

    We have only one planet and the idea that we can just do whatever we please with no effect is absurd. Already we have a mass of plastic in the middle of the pacific that no one wants to clean up. We are in the process of wiping out all marine life in the gulf of Mexico. What exactly does it take for anyone to take our treatment of the planet seriously? Do we seriously have to be facing extinction in order to change our ways? Do you want to tell your grandchildren as the planet dies that we just didn't have any solid proof in time? Being environmentally aware is not something we should be forced to do it should be something we feel obligated to do. We have but one earth.

  • Stan Richie

    I think South Park got it right about Global Warming. "We all need to Fart in moderation." That includes the "verbal gas" floating around in here.

    Global warming is part of all the above and we're just here for the ride. We contribute to the speed of it, as well as the natural cyclical events our planet goes through. Yes, air travel has to stop. A jumbo jet contributes 50,000 times in one trip of what a car burns in a year. But, 50,000 vehicles emit in one year what the jet does in one trip. Add a drop to a sponge and it get heavier, keep adding and soon or a later you have to squeeze it.

    That's what Mother Nature is doing, and yes, it's all a financial gain from a corporate or governmental perspective, but with good reasoning and good morality behind it as well.

    The simple fact we all have to face is we will have to adapt and make the changes or we will go the way of the T-Rex too.

  • @mooja Life wouldn't be possible for anything without water. Go and drink 20 liters of water and see what happens to you. You die.

    Just because something is necessary for life doesn't mean it can't reach harmful levels of accumulation.

  • roora

    Shit is a naturally occurring excrement from human bodies too, just like CO2 is. We have plenty of government regulations on it, and for good reason. REASON. That's the important issue. Ever tried it?

  • Mooja

    CO2 is a naturally occurring gas that is fundamental and necessary, either directly or indirectly, for all life on Earth. Every living plant, algae, and cyanobacteria depends on CO2 to sustain their metabolic processes. How in the name of common sense can such a thing be described as a pollutant? If you are reading this you are exhaling CO2. How in the name of common sense can we be considering legislation which would put government regulations on the gas humans produce every time they exhale?

  • poop

    Hey FACT You are totally wrong, its all a bunch of lies from the liberal media cause your jealous of oil companies profits. Let them be america stop trying to take our freedumb.

  • TO NON-BELIEVERS

    This "cycle" is not supposed to happen for another thousand years. These cycles take hundreds of centuries to change. Earth does not warm this rapidly. What do you think the effect of burning fuel for 100 years has done? Nothing? Where is all that gas going to? Outer Space? We have an atmosphere.

  • Cody Frehr

    There is doubt in my mind that solar energy could have a large future in America. In contrast, some of the biggest names are behind the energy industry; they aren't about to let this happen.

    Here is my opinion: Eventually we have to stop generating energy from coal. The US gets 76% of it's energy from coal burning power plants. 5000 people die a year from coal mining related incidents, not to mention it is generating 10% of the worlds pollution. France gets the exact same amount of energy, 76%, from nuclear power. Why can't we? Not that solar energy isn't a reliable alternative, but the land that would be required to power this country is too much. With our population increasing exponentially, that land will eventually be used for real estate. Nuclear energy is our future.

  • Julieta J. Lamers

    Who says the world has to be the same today as it was yesterday? Why must it be the same tomorrow? There is historical record that the earth has done this many times before, long before people were driving around in SUVs.
    Stop spreading the rumors of global warming, they are false.

  • Nice, the rightwing fuckmob from Digg has arrived. Welcome dittoheads, glad to have ya. :D

  • Charles

    Why is it that everytime some idiot spouts more crap about "Global Warming" the next idiot HAS to mention AL Gore. Have you actually done any REAL research? Your "Green King" uses more than 20 time the electricity of an average American at just ONE of his houses. He has 14,000 sq/ft of home between hiw two houses. Wouldn't it be greener to live in a more modest house? Big houses take a lot of electricity to run. Not to mention the fact that he has a HUGE lawn. I wonder how much water that takes? Have you looked up how many miles he travels each year by PRIVATE JET??? Wouldn't a hybrid bus be greener?

    How about the fact that he doesn't use the green energy alternatives in either of his homes even though it's available. I guess he'd rather offset his carbon-rich life by buying credits from the company he chairs and draws an income from: Generation Investment Management.

    Your emperor wears no clothes, oh wait, yes he does and he really likes Armani. I wonder if they use any hemp in their clothes. Care to bet?

    Shall we now get into the discussion on how humans generate less than 3% of the Earth's CO2? The other 97% is produced naturally. Maybe we should outlaw volcanos and decaying plants.

    Green has become the new shame-based religion of the millenia. Maybe your sky is falling, but mine looks clear and blue.

  • Uncle B is nuts

    Uncle B everything beyond your first sentence is completely delusional paranoid drivel. If you want to help the environment try joining a the rest of society in a relevant dialog.

  • Josh

    so people still believe that global warming is caused by man, eh. so passé. ever heard of the ice age? oh yeah, i forgot dinosaurs rolled hella dirty in their escalades for thousands of years. fags.

  • Alex

    The earth is fine, get this fact right. It's the people who are fucked. At least to reiterate the late George Carlin who was right about this. We pose absolutely ZERO threat to the earth, the only threat we pose is to ourselves, even though we'll survive.

  • Robert Dexx

    Another problem with the pine beetles is that standing dead pine trees burn slightly better than gasoline. And there's a lot of dead red/brown trees in the picture.

  • Hey people polluting the planet! I can take lots of things but don't mess with my North Western FORESTS!! I will find you and make you pay.

    www.giveback.net - inspiration. action. change.

  • Jonas Grimby

    Natural cycles of the earth's climate are being over-dramatized for financial gain. The warming will pass. Stop spreading the rumors of global warming, they are false.

  • Uncle B

    We have to stop using fossil fuels to turn around global warming! If the U.S. had chosen to be a moral people, and leaving Iraqi oil alone, and following Al Gore, decided to develop the South Western deserts, with the technology of the times - solar/thermal-molten sodium - electricity installations, for the same amount of money as that war cost, ($650 Billion), today, we would be tapping into the largest, renewable, sustainable, energy source the world has ever known. It would have paid every energy bill in the U.S.A. for maintenance fees only - FOREVER! It would be equivalent to an oil field that can NEVER run dry! Low cost electric power, and storeable hydrogen gasoline replacement from the electricity, for all!
    After the millions of murders, and $650 billions of dollars, borrowed from our children’s futures and pissed away, with thousands of our own and others maimed and disfigured for life, millions of families utterly destroyed, ours and theirs, we are no closer to Iraqi oil production than the Iraqis are!
    The next time you hear a blithering idiot spoiled brat, drunken, drug addicted, sociopath, rich Arabic saber dancing daddie’s boy oilman, stand at a microphone and threaten YOUR safety with someone ELSE’S weapons, remember what you lost America, remember, and weep! (also see http://www.sciam.com/article.c...

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: