Quantcast

’30 Days’ Sends a Hunter to Live with Animal Rights Activists

June 26, 2008 · Print This Article

At first glance, one might equate the FX show ’30 Days’ with similar set-ups on reality television like ‘Wife Swap’. The purpose is clear from the get-go: to help people with radically different ideologies come to an understanding about each other, and even if they don’t ultimately agree, they’re expected to gain some sense of a middle ground. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn’t. What sets this show apart is that it deals with real issues, and keeps the made-for-TV manufactured drama to a minimum.

This episode, entitled ‘Animal Rights’, puts hunter George Snedeker into the home of Melissa Karpel, an events coordinator for PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals).

“A deer, cow, a chicken… their sole purpose is to feed us,” George says before leaving his North Carolina home for Los Angeles. George’s intention going into this wasn’t to gain some cloud-piercing revelation that would change his life, or even to convince the animal rights activists to agree with his views. All he wanted, he said, was to understand why these people can be ‘so extreme’.

Melissa certainly holds views about animals that are opposite those of George. She firmly believes that animals do not belong to humans for food, clothing, experiments or entertainment. Melissa stated early on that all she wanted was to show George what it’s like to live with a family who happen to be vegans and animal rights activists, but it became clear that she was truly hoping to help George see the light.

Forcing George to dress up in a chicken costume as part of a KFC protest probably wasn’t the best way to get started, and indeed, it set the mood for the week that followed, which was full of angry, emotional arguments between George and Melissa.

Once George started working at an animal sanctuary, he also clashed with director Lorri Bauston, but after his day-to-day work with the animals, George did begin to understand the extent to which animals are mistreated on factory farms. This face-to-face interaction with abused animals is far more effective for the skeptical George than taking part in shouting, overly dramatic protests. Lorri’s insensitive comparison of killing chickens to the Holocaust, however, threatened to derail the progress.

Similarly, when George visited the office of Dr. Aysha Akhtar to learn about animal testing, Dr. Akhtar’s rational explanation of the extremely low rates at which animal testing were even helpful for humans and display of alternatives seemed to make more of an impression on George, who was impressed that he “finally got to talk to somebody that had something besides a rant.”

Seeing the treatment of cows at a dairy farm and the plight of many domestic animals in shelters did help George see the animal rights cause from a different angle. By the end of the episode, George was willingly explaining to strangers in a supermarket how calves on factory farms are crammed into tight spaces unable to turn around. George declared his surprise at the fact that, despite being ‘hard-headed’, he felt that he had been truly affected by what he had learned. George probably won’t stop hunting or eating meat, but he’ll likely think twice about how animals were treated before they end up on his plate.

Ultimately, PETA’s black-and-white views and shove-it-down-your-throat delivery of their message didn’t exactly enhance Melissa’s message. If anything, it damages many efforts to improve the lives of animals because it automatically puts people with differing views on the offensive. Putting PETA activists together with an avid hunter makes for good TV, but the message may have been more effective if PETA were left out of it.

Initially, when the episode first started, I thought that perhaps the producers of ’30 Days’ intended for Melissa to learn that she may want to soften the presentation of her views in order to make a bigger impact, but that doesn’t seem to have been the case. I think that what this episode illustrates by the end, however, is that educating people about the reality of the way animals are treated before they’re on our plates, made into our belts and shoes – or after we drop them off at the pound – is far more effective than stunts and scare tactics.

It’s a shame that the idea of more humane processes for meat and dairy weren’t explored further in this episode, because that’s where I think a true middle ground lies. Humans – as natural omnivores and the presiding predators on the planet – will not be likely to forgo using animals for food and clothing any time soon. However, needless suffering could certainly be eliminated.

In our quest for greater convenience, we have allowed millions of animals to be beaten, electrocuted, blinded, skinned alive, chemically manipulated, crammed into tiny spaces, thrown around like inanimate objects and generally treated like they cannot feel at all. Increased sensitivity to the pain and suffering of animals – and their right to be treated in a way that respects their place on the planet – is the only way to compromise, as George the hunter was able to acknowledge for himself after 30 days.

You can view the episode online at Hulu or just watch here:

Link [Hulu] + [FX]

Related Posts:

Morgan Spurlock Hits the West Virginia Coal Mines for ’30 Days’
KFC to Offer Vegan Chicken in Canada
Great Apes Achieve Rights on Par with Humans in Spain
‘Jackass’ Steve-O is Actually Serious about Animal Activism
Student Group Eats a Cat in the Name of Animal Welfare

Comments

8 Responses to “’30 Days’ Sends a Hunter to Live with Animal Rights Activists”

  1. K-Man on June 26th, 2008 2:59 pm

    I have increasingly come to believe that the issues with eating meat are hard to solve, so hard that we are probably a lot better off not eating meat or eating less of it.

    The environmental problems with meat is bigger than with cars! So add that to the moral issues. We also have health issues on top of that. All together, hard to stop (I love a big steak), but probably the right thing to do.

  2. Stephanie Rogers on June 26th, 2008 3:03 pm

    I agree, K-Man… my views on eating meat and the effects on the world could probably fill a book. What it does to the environment is no small issue. I wish that people would stop, but, I accept that it just ain’t gonna happen. However, if people were more educated about what goes on at most factory farms, I think they’d not only eat less meat but demand better practices. Unfortunately a lot of people (like my husband used to be, before I got to him) just don’t want to hear it - they’d rather be ignorant so they can go on enjoying their burgers, steaks and fried chicken without guilt.

  3. Roy on June 26th, 2008 6:27 pm

    Buy locally grown food. Animal or vegetable.

    My local beef is the best damn cow I’ve ever had, is grass-fed, free-range, artificial hormone-free, etc. etc. And far fewer of the problems of mass-produced beef, ethically or environmentally.

    Local food rocks. Gas prices are causing restaurants around here to start using more local stuff, and I love it.

  4. Stephanie Rogers on June 26th, 2008 6:42 pm

    True, true. After learning more about factory farming, my husband has made a vow to only eat grass-fed free range locally grown meat. Luckily living in Asheville NC, we have some really good local farms. My husband really likes Hickory Nut Gap - we’re going to start buying from them directly. Since meeting me though, his consumption of meat has gone way down. I only cook vegetarian meals :)

  5. Roy on June 26th, 2008 6:52 pm

    Nice. Yeah, there was that one video where they were shoving sick cows around with a forklift, that was only brought to light because they were violating the “they have to be able to walk into the slaughterhouse” rule.

    I loves me some meat, but my standards for treatment, even for something as mindless as a cow, are significantly higher than “has to be able to walk”.

  6. Kassy on July 1st, 2008 2:16 pm

    This had to be one of the most amazing shows i have seen.ever. I literally sat here && talked to myself arguing with the hunter. I even went as far as to cry during the show when all the abuse to the cows were taking place. I am so glad he sees now that animals SHOULD have rights && i am so glad that PETA could change his life.

  7. rk thompson on July 11th, 2008 5:53 pm

    You may feel that ‘humans are omnivores and won’t stop eating meat’ but you may want to do a little more research. Even if you feel that killing animals for food is fine and dandy, I’m sorry to tell you that the planet cannot support factory farming anymore.
    The environmental degredation it has already caused is tragic, and with industrializing countries like China, India and Brazil starting to adpot more westernized diets- rainforests are being cleared to grow grain for livestock- the most inefficient possible use of resources. Not to mention the huge amounts of water wasted on farming animals.
    Meat eating will end, out of necessity- that’s just a fact. Hopefully sooner rather than later.

  8. Stephanie Rogers on July 11th, 2008 8:57 pm

    Hey man, I’m a vegetarian. My own *personal* view is that people *should* stop eating meat because you’re right, the planet can’t support factory farming in its current form for too much longer. I believe that if you’re gonna eat meat, you should either raise it yourself or buy it from a local farmer. I just don’t believe that most people will give up meat. Too many people believe fervently that humans need meat to survive. I heartily disagree with that, and think that we’re intelligent enough creatures with enough control over our environment to survive just fine without it. But, what are you going to do - go to war with meat eaters?

Got something to say?