Quantcast

‘New Urbanism’ Taking Over the Suburban American Dream

by Stephanie Rogers · View Comments

Livin’ in the suburbs ain’t what it used to be. Where once there was an endless parade of ‘little boxes on the hillside’ – with their flawless emerald carpets of grass, shiny SUVs in each driveway and children riding their bicycles along the sidewalks – now has become dotted with abandoned buildings, overgrown grass, graffiti and caution tape. American suburbs are starting to look like the alt-timeline version of Marty’s hometown in Back to the Future: desolate and crime-ridden.

The suburban American dream is dying, helped in no small part by the subprime mortgage crisis and perhaps set to be finished by ever-rising energy costs. While some may mourn this picturesque model of American living and all of the Norman Rockwell nostalgia that goes along with it, others are seeing a better future in urban living. What many people are finding is that urban life is the sustainable model of living that will help us cut back on pollution and preserve what’s left of our untouched land.

CNN has more:

This change can be witnessed in places like Atlanta, Georgia, Detroit, Michigan, and Dallas, Texas, said Leinberger, where once rundown downtowns are being revitalized by well-educated, young professionals who have no desire to live in a detached single family home typical of a suburbia where life is often centered around long commutes and cars.

Instead, they are looking for what Leinberger calls “walkable urbanism” — both small communities and big cities characterized by efficient mass transit systems and high density developments enabling residents to walk virtually everywhere for everything — from home to work to restaurants to movie theaters.

The so-called New Urbanism movement emerged in the mid-90s and has been steadily gaining momentum, especially with rising energy costs, environmental concerns and health problems associated with what Leinberger calls “drivable suburbanism” — a low-density built environment plan that emerged around the end of the World War II and has been the dominant design in the U.S. ever since.

Experts are anticipating a major structural change in the way we live, driven by the desire for walkable communities that keep us close to everything we need to live our daily lives – public transportation, employment, shopping and recreation. It’ll take a while for the country to catch up, since governmental regulations and zoning laws will have to be adjusted to allow for high-density developments, but after a while it’s expected that all of those suburban McMansions will get divided up into multi-family housing for the poor.

Many people will see this as gentrification of our urban centers, and fear that the spirit of many of our cities will be compromised. It generally does happen that as downtown real estate is purchased by developers to turn into condos or other high-end spaces, the colorful small businesses that once flourished are forced out. Hopefully, cities will make an effort to retain diversity in urban areas so that in the process of ‘new urbanism’, our cities don’t turn into gleaming re-arranged versions of the stereotypical homogenized suburban neighborhood.

Link [CNN]
Photo credit: Jim Zarroli/NPR

  • Roy
    Call me an insensitive middle class white guy... but I'm in favor of an economic shift that prevents that lady in the apartment complex from DRIVING TO THE GYM THAT IS IN THIS COMPLEX from her apartment.

    But in any case, what might happen is a shift to more light commercial zoning in residential areas for retail shops and other employment opportunities and such. If there's a corner market a few blocks away, then even a suburban townhouse doesn't have to have three cars. I'm rooting for the rezoning option. It'll be better for suburbs, cities, and everyone living in either.
  • I agree, Holly - that's what I mean by hoping that cities retain diversity - there needs to be a variety of housing for all income levels so that the poor aren't completely pushed out. Hopefully by then, public transportation systems will have seen vast improvement as well, so that the people who do remain in the suburbs can get to work, the grocery store, etc.

    I think part of the point of the CNN piece was that public perception of the 'American Dream' is changing, and the suburbs may lose their place to 'New Urbanism'. I don't think that wealthy people will completely abandon suburbs, and I certainly hope that suburbs don't get taken over by poor people with nowhere else to go and abandoned by a society focused on dense urban living. I would imagine that there will be a lot of effort in many cities to provide affordable housing for all income levels.

    But, I also agree with the CNN author's opinion that many large suburban houses will be turned into multi-family homes because of the simple fact that many people won't be able to afford having such large homes all to themselves anymore (not only will they be unable to afford it, but it just makes more sense for people to downsize to conserve resources). It's just like many Victorian-era neighborhoods all over the country, where those huge houses have been turned into apartment buildings.
  • Holly
    Sure the people with good jobs can afford to move into the cities and buy a nice condo. But what about the poor people that were living in the city before it was "revitalized". They use to live in those rundown apartments before they got turned into high-end condos. The lower income families get pushed out into the suburbs, and forced into buying cars they can't afford, let alone put gas in. The poor are now living in neighborhoods that have little to offer in support and jobs since everyone is flocking to the city and whose food pantries start to run dry as there is a higher demand and less people able to give. I am all for people living in smaller more urban homes and communities, but to really improve as a community all people must be part of the solution. Not just pushed to the side.
  • Hi Mark.

    In large cities, like NYC, Chicago, Seattle, etc. that won't be necessary, but in smaller urban centers, many cities have laws (such as max height of buildings) that would make high density housing developments difficult to build unless the laws were changed. Not all cities were built to have a large number of occupants.

    The speculation that 'McMansions' in the suburbs will be divided up for multi-family housing comes from several experts including Arthur C. Nelson, director of Virginia Tech's Metropolitan Institute. That's not only due to families moving to cities, it's also due to the current mortgage crisis. Suburbs are being abandoned at pretty startling rates across the country, leaving these houses in disrepair. The trend will probably lead not just to higher density populations in cities but in suburbs, as well, with fewer people owning large homes by themselves.
  • Mark
    Please explain what you mean by this:

    "governmental regulations and zoning laws will have to be adjusted to allow for high-density developments"

    At first, you were saying that suburbanites are going to be flocking back to city centers. If that's the case, why would re-zoning be necessary? Cities are zoned for density.

    Do you really believe that "McMansions" are going to be subdivided for poor families in the wake of a mass exodus of wealthy families to the cities? That seems pretty far-fetched.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: